What’s the End Game?

TWS art 9

 

After the results from Super Tuesday, Dr. Ben Carson now appears to have dropped out of the presidential race. Despite his political defeat he stated, “this grassroots movement on behalf of ‘We the People’ will continue . . . I remain committed to Saving America for Future Generations.” [a]

Committed to Saving America.

With the upcoming election I’ve increasingly heard similar things such as, “Restore America,” “Reclaim America,” “Make America Great Again,” “Return to our Judaeo-Christian Roots,” and now “Saving America.”

I wonder, what does this “saving” and “restoration” for America mean for us as Christians? The idea has been bothering me really, so I’ve started asking some questions:

1) Are we expecting King Jesus to someday take over the presidency and establish His Kingdom in America – keeping Constitution, democracy and the whole kit and caboodle? 

When Jesus returns to the earth the Apostle John tells us that, “From His mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations, and He will rule them with a rod of iron.” [c]

Not very democratic. Jesus will not rule by election or by delegation, He will rule by self-appointed and complete authority. The perfect despot. A good and just King. For many, this will end their pursuit of happiness.

2) Are we expecting Jesus to rapture us from Utopian America?  . . .and would we be disappointed if He did?

A Utopian America seems very nice, in theory, but a society with high morals without the Spirit of Jesus would only be outwardly law-keeping and inwardly dead. . . a white washed tomb as Jesus called it. All the centuries of Mosaic law speak to forced morality being powerless to transform people’s hearts and minds, so why would we expect anything created by men to do better?

Jesus asks the question, “when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?”[b]  The fact that Jesus poses this as a question implies that faith will be scarce when He returns. If America were full of Christian faith then when would Jesus come? I wonder if we would rather have the perfect American society or the return of Jesus.

3) Are we hoping Jesus will postpone His return until a future generation?

When the prophet Isaiah told king Hezekiah about the future Babylonian captivity we are told two things about Hezekiah’s response: what he said and what he thought. Hezekiah said to Isaiah, “The word of the Lord that you have spoken is good.” Hezekiah thought, “Why not, if there will be peace and security in my days?”

I wonder if we’ve unwittingly taken a similar approach as Hezekiah, hoping that the time of the end were not in our days but in the days of our unknown descendants so that we could live in peace and security now. If this is indeed the case, then it reveals that our true affection is for this life rather than the Lord and His will. “Maranatha” is not in our hearts.

4) Do we believe what the Prophets, the Apostles and Jesus Himself have said?

Here is what we have been told about the “last days.”

  • “And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold.” [d]
  • “But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty.” [e]
  • “Remember the predictions of the holy prophets . . . that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires.” [f]

The Scriptures must be fulfilled. Jesus has told us that the world would spin out of control in the clutches of evil and that nothing would make it stop except His return.

Brace yourselves for this one, oh patriots: All the kingdoms of the earth will be reduced to dust, including the United States of America [g]. We have not been asked to preserve America or its morals, though it may be sad to see its decline. Instead we have been given a better and holy commission: to make fellow disciples of Jesus. But rest assured, abandoning this misplaced hope for America’s “saving” is no cause for fear, for our King has told us, “My Kingdom is not of this world.” [h] So instead of fear, “let us be grateful for receiving a Kingdom that cannot be shaken.” [i]

9 thoughts on “What’s the End Game?

  1. Good stuff, Ryan! About the return of Jesus…I once prayed for that at a men’s retreat – and I meant it sincerely. Afterwards, one guy come up to me and said he couldn’t pray that because he wanted to see his kids grow up and play soccer first. I was dumbstruck at that sentiment!!! NOTHING is better than His return! Maranatha, Lord Jesus! (Tonight would be just great!!!!!)

    Liked by 1 person

    • Like the psychological test, “say the first word that comes to mind,” our initial reactions to the thought of His return will reveal our hearts’ leaning.

      Paul says, “We know that while we are at home in the body we are away from the Lord, for we walk by faith, not by sight. Yes, we are of good courage, and we would rather be away from the body and at home with the Lord.” (2 Corinthians 5:6-8)

      As bad, or even as good, as this life may be, nothing compares with the presence of our Lord!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Ryan,

    You hit me with toooooo much. I cant cope with it all.

    As far as calling the bluff on America (and “Saving America”… “Reclaiming Am…” “Making …Great” etc… I am there, bro. I am there.The bluff is called. Few are listening to even catch the drift.

    Btw, I have written extensively on Judas Iscariot (elsewhere), and I suspect that if we did not have that one little verse in John’s Gospel painting him with greed (which surely, since John points it out, is part of the larger picture alright), then I am not so sure greed would be the only brush withwhich we pain his portrait. And in fact, perhaps greed is the smaller aspect of his motivation to sell Jesus for 30 silver coins – a small sum for such an important person, btw.

    I have speculated that Judas is named after Judas Maccabee – THE HAMMER! He was named after this recent hero of the Jews who actually won independence for Israel that lasted more than 100 years. Judas Maccabee was a HOLY B.A.! And kinda the way Mary named her son after that Joshua guy who led his people into the Promised Land, so Mrs. Iscariot named her son after the guy that won independence. A little like naming your son Lee in the South today.

    And then by the way, Iscariot was not really his last name, nor his mom’s last name. And though it is not a settled issue, it is entirely likely that the term Iscariot could be related to Sicarii. Judas Iscariot really could have been a Jewish hitman for the Jewish mob. But in this case the mob were like extremist patriots. A Jewish version of Jihadist. Throat cutters for God! Zealots in black ops.

    Now… with this background somewhat established, imagine this cat listening to Jesus telling the people on the Mount of the Sermon “Love your enemies….” and a few other choice things about forgiveness. I think Simon the Zealot, Peter, the Rock, and James n John the Sons of Thunder were a little dense in the head like jar head marines. They knew they had joined a Special Op Force of Holy proportions, but they really did not listen too carefully – as evidenced by moments like asking Jesus for a favor – “Hey, Jesus! We have a favor to ask: When you come in Glory, grant that one of us get to run a tank division and the other gets to fly Apache helo!… Yeah… Yeah!! yeah!!!! (and the unspoken part suggesting that maybe Peter and Simon -and certainly a tax collector like Levi/Matthew – could handle latrines!)

    Hmmm…. I think a Dark Ops guy like Judas would put it together after a bit whereas the jarheads would just be like my dog – not too critical of me. and once he put it together that this Joshua keeps predicting his own crucifixion – like as if it were his plan all along – Judas needed OUT of this organization. And he might really want to save his reputation from it too. Selling out Jesus for 30 pieces of bottom dollar silver might just show enough contempt to the world for him that he could patch together his reputation and join a “real” special ops group – or even lead one someday! But a daggerman does not “love his enemies” and plans to whip some Roman butt, not die on a Roman cross! That’s not good patriotism!

    Now… if I am on to something with all this… it shows that we American types probably have a lot more in common with Judas than we care to admit. And it is a lot more complex and political than just a little greed (though it almost certainly involves that too).

    Just sayin’

    X

    Liked by 1 person

    • The musician Michael Card writes:

      “Now Judas don’t you come to close
      I fear that I might see
      That traitor’s look upon your face
      Might look too much like me
      Cause just like you I’ve sold the Lord
      And often for much less
      And like a retched traitor
      I betrayed Him with a kiss”

      In all of us there is a Judas. All of us betray Him with other loyalties, some more egregious than others. I’ve read this about the Sicarii and the idea of Judas being the man of the dagger. I also think of the other Simon. The gospel writer Luke identifies Simon as “the Zealot.” And though this terrorist political party may not yet existed organizationally yet when Jesus was alive, the group would have been called this by the time Luke wrote of Simon. According to the Jewish historian Josephus, the Zealots had a motto: “No king but messiah, no tax but the temple, no friend but the Zealot.” Josephus tells us that the Zealots, resorting to violence out of their hatred of the Romans, which eventually provoked the Roman War, leading to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD by Titus. In all three synoptic gospel accounts Jesus is seen overcome with sorrow because of the future destruction of Jerusalem. He sees with troubling foreknowledge the terrible things that would happen there: of starvation leading to cannibalism and of crucifixions so numerous that the Romans would run out of wood to make crosses, even after cutting down all the trees on the Mount of Olives. So what was Jesus’ connection with the Jewish nationalists whose motto was, “No king but messiah”? Nothing. His involvement was not with the Zealots. Rather, he calls together an unlikely group of disciples and radically transforms them, extraordinarily uniting someone like Matthew the tax collector who has made a living by working on behalf of Rome and Simon the Zealot who has devoted his life to Rome’s violent expulsion. I would offer to suggest that Jesus’ tears for Jerusalem and its suffering was because so many would die with a motto referencing messiah on their lips, but in their hearts would never know Him.

      X, like you mentioned of Judas’ juxtaposition to Jesus’ teaching, in view of the Zealot’s radical hatred it is simply remarkable that Simon would be transformed by Jesus’ radical love. It is remarkable that Simon the Zealot could listen to, let alone accept and follow some of the teachings of his new Master:

      Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. (Mt 5:39)

      And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. (Mt 5:41)

      It is only through radical and all-out discipleship that we are changed into His image most expediently. But once we are His, He will stop at nothing to accomplish it!

      Liked by 2 people

  3. I try to stay out of politics. The more I see of conservatism, the less I want to be a conservative. Nor do I agree with some of the liberal agenda. And as for being a moderate and being half-way in between–nah.

    I really liked point 2 about a Utopian America. The Religious Right has told us for years that all we need to do is to elect the right Republicans, staff the Supreme Court with the right justices, bring back our “Judeo-Christian values”, and we’ll have the Kingdom of God on earth. Of course, they don’t actually say the last phrase, but that’s where it ends up.

    But trying to make the nation more righteous without the Spirit of God is futile. What if we stopped putting so much money and effort into fighting for the Constitution and instead put that money, time, effort, and enthusiasm into spreading the Gospel and attacking the problems inside the church? There are so many problems in the Church today that I think we need some major revival WITHIN the church before we even think of bringing more people into it.

    So, thanks for the post!

    Liked by 2 people

    • I have come to the same conclusion that you have Joel, by not taking sides politically. I tend to be more critical of the conservative side only because this is the side many Christians identify with, and frankly I find this a misplaced identity.

      The conservative movement seems obsessed with using worldly means (political power, forced morality, elections and the like) to accomplish what they see as spiritual gain: morally good people, living happy lives in nice homes, far away from immoral people. . . when in the end I don’t see how this lifestyle goal necessarily advances the Kingdom cause.

      I’ve said this before, but I would also add that, why don’t we Christians look more to the example of Christ? Jesus’ “political involvement” was not with the Romans nor the Herodians, nor with the religiopolitical entities of His own nation, the Sadducees, the Pharisees, and the Zealots, NOR even with those who were suffering from Roman oppression and wanted Him as their earthly king. His work on earth was that of compassion and healing so that eyes would be opened to His eternal healing. Likewise, the pointing to His eternal healing is the business we should be about.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I think Jesus was being political with the Herodians, Sadducees and really even Romans too. But I think he tapped into a religiopolitic that largely we miss, and so did they. The whole “No King but God” slogan from Zechariah was basically a reaction to that moment when Samuel hears from God that when the people say they want a king like the nations, they are rejecting God as king, not Samuel.

        Fastforward to the life of Christ and we have a prophet who comes to show us what it looks like when God becomes King of Israel at long last (again).

        Or, as I am apt to put it, he went to the place of shame, pain, and despair in his community and bore the image of God there.

        By saying this, I do not negate your deeper point (I don’t believe). But actually sharpen it up. God’s rule is all about compassion and healing… THAT IS WHAT THE RULE OF GOD IS LIKE, but it is still rule, reign over his creation. And there can only be one ruler, ultimately. Thus only one who sets the ultimate standard of reigning…. I believe it gets political.

        But I believe the pseudo Christian politics this post addresses are not God’s politics. I think they are a sham… As one recent politician said, lipstick on a pig, but its still a pig. And I think she was speaking about her own politics, actually.

        There… I said my bit.

        I too appreciate the post… the whole blog actually.

        Keep it up.

        X

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment